Cannabis News New York

Most New York Cannabis Operators to Save Big Without Potency Tax

13 minutes, 15 seconds Read


Contents hide

New York state’s cannabis industry has faced various challenges since its legalization. From dealing with regulations to competing in the market, it hasn’t been easy for businesses. However, there have been some recent changes in tax laws that could make a big difference.

Key Takeaway: The removal of the potency tax and the introduction of a new excise tax system are likely to benefit most cannabis businesses in New York. This change is expected to make things easier by simplifying tax requirements and possibly lowering costs.

It’s important for cannabis businesses to understand these new tax regulations so they can make the most of this opportunity. By following the rules and finding ways to minimize taxes, companies can save money and increase their profits.

If you’re interested in finding out how to optimize your taxes, it’s a good idea to talk to a lawyer who specializes in this area. They can give you expert advice based on your specific situation. For instance, Roach420 offers expert advice and resources tailored to cannabis businesses.

To stay informed on local developments within the industry, it’s crucial to regularly check this link. This resource provides valuable insights into the ever-evolving landscape of New York’s cannabis market. Additionally, keeping up with this page will help you stay ahead by tracking the latest trends shaping the industry.

Understanding the Transition from Potency Tax to Excise Tax

Previous Potency Tax System

The potency tax, which was previously implemented in New York, was structured based on the THC content of cannabis products. This system imposed higher taxes on products with greater THC concentrations, creating a significant burden for both businesses and consumers. The potency tax had several limitations:

  • Complex Calculation: The tax required detailed measurement and reporting of THC levels, complicating compliance and record-keeping for businesses.
  • Higher Costs: Products with higher THC levels were taxed more heavily, often leading to inflated prices that discouraged legal purchases.
  • Competitive Disadvantage: Legal cannabis businesses faced competition from illegal operations not subject to these taxes, exacerbating market challenges.

New Excise Tax System

The transition to an excise tax system marks a significant shift in the taxation approach for cannabis products in New York state. This new system is designed to be simpler and more predictable:

  • Fixed Rate: The excise tax is set at 9% of the retail price, providing clarity and consistency for businesses across the supply chain.
  • Application: The excise tax is applied at different stages, ensuring that it covers all transactions from cultivation to retail. This includes:
  • Cultivators: Taxed on sales to processors or retailers.
  • Processors/Manufacturers: Responsible for excise tax on sales to dispensaries or other end-point retailers.
  • Retailers: Collect excise tax at the point of sale to consumers.

Benefits and Challenges

The new excise tax system aims to simplify compliance and reduce overall tax burdens, especially for larger dispensaries. Manhattan dispensaries, for example, may see their total tax burden decrease from approximately 23% to 18%, fostering a more competitive legal market. However, microbusinesses face unique challenges under this regime:

  • Higher Relative Costs: For microbusinesses, which often operate with smaller margins, the fixed percentage may represent a higher relative cost compared to larger operators.
  • Compliance Pressure: Ensuring accurate collection and remittance of taxes at various stages can increase administrative burdens.

Understanding these changes is crucial for all cannabis operators in New York state as they navigate the evolving regulatory landscape.

Implications of the Excise Tax on Cannabis Businesses

Potential Impact on Different Types of Cannabis Businesses

The shift from a potency tax to an excise tax is expected to have varying implications for different types of cannabis businesses in New York. The new excise tax system imposes a 9% tax on the sale of cannabis products, replacing the previous tax model that was based on THC content. This change helps create a more predictable and potentially lower tax burden for many operators, particularly those engaged in high-volume sales.

Manhattan Dispensaries:

  • Reduced Tax Burden: Manhattan dispensaries, among other larger retail operations, stand to gain significantly from this transition. The potency tax’s reliance on THC content often resulted in higher taxes for products with higher THC levels, which are frequently more popular among consumers. By shifting to an excise tax based solely on sales price, dispensaries can benefit from reduced overall tax liabilities.
  • A sampling of dispensaries in Manhattan suggests that their total tax burden could decrease from approximately 23% under the potency tax regime to about 18% with the excise tax. This reduction allows these businesses to adjust their pricing strategies more flexibly, which can enhance competitive positioning and customer retention.
  • Competitive Advantage: Lowering the effective tax rate enables dispensaries to offer more competitive pricing compared to illicit market operators who do not incur such taxes. This advantage is crucial in attracting price-sensitive customers and increasing legal market share.

Impact on Microbusinesses:

While larger businesses like Manhattan dispensaries benefit from a reduced tax burden, microbusinesses face unique challenges under the new system. The state’s approximation of wholesale costs at 75% of retail selling prices places a relatively higher tax burden on these smaller operators compared to their larger counterparts.

Microbusinesses often operate with tighter margins and less capital flexibility, making it harder for them to absorb additional costs without passing them on to consumers. This can lead to increased pricing pressures and potentially limit their ability to compete effectively in the market.

Key Considerations:

  • Profit Margins: Larger dispensaries may see improved profit margins due to lower effective taxes.
  • Pricing Strategies: Both large and small businesses need to reassess their pricing models in light of new tax rates.
  • Market Dynamics: The excise tax structure may drive shifts in consumer behavior as businesses adjust their offerings and prices.

Understanding these implications is crucial for cannabis operators aiming to optimize their business strategies under New York’s evolving regulatory landscape.

Key Differences: Excise Tax vs Potency Tax

New York’s transition from a potency tax based on THC content to an excise tax introduces significant changes in the taxation landscape for cannabis businesses.

Potency Tax

  • Calculation Method: The potency tax was levied based on the THC content of the cannabis product. Higher THC concentrations led to higher taxes.
  • Impact on Pricing: This system often resulted in elevated prices for high-THC products, affecting both businesses and consumers.
  • Market Disparities: Legal operations faced competitive disadvantages as illegal sellers bypassed these taxes, leading to skewed market dynamics.

Excise Tax

  • Uniform Rate: The new excise tax is set at a flat 9% rate, independent of THC levels. This simplifies the taxation process.
  • Price Sensitivity: The excise tax fluctuates with the price of cannabis, potentially alleviating some financial pressures during market downturns.
  • Reduction in Burden: Initial assessments suggest that this could reduce the total tax burden on dispensaries, making legal cannabis more competitively priced.

Summary Comparison

  • Complexity vs. Simplicity: The potency tax required detailed THC measurements, complicating compliance, whereas the excise tax offers a straightforward percentage-based system.
  • Economic Equity: While larger dispensaries stand to gain significantly from reduced taxes under the new regime, microbusinesses may experience uneven benefits due to their unique cost structures.

Understanding these fundamental distinctions aids operators in adapting their business strategies to leverage potential savings and maintain competitive pricing in New York’s evolving cannabis market.

Addressing Challenges for Microbusinesses under the Excise Tax Regime

Microbusinesses in New York’s cannabis industry face distinct challenges under the new excise tax regime. These small-scale operators, unlike larger dispensaries, often encounter higher compliance costs and significant pricing pressures due to elevated tax rates on wholesale cannabis.

Increased Compliance Costs

One of the primary hurdles for microbusinesses is the administrative burden associated with adhering to the new tax regulations. The excise tax system mandates meticulous record-keeping and reporting, which can be resource-intensive for smaller operations with limited staff and financial resources.

  • Detailed tracking of sales, inventory, and taxes paid.
  • Need for specialized accounting services to ensure compliance.
  • Higher costs related to hiring legal and financial professionals.

These regulatory burdens, which have been extensively studied by organizations like the OECD, disproportionately impact microbusinesses. The additional costs and complexities involved in meeting compliance requirements can hinder their growth and sustainability.

Pricing Pressures

The shift from a potency-based tax to an excise tax imposes a heavier financial load on microbusinesses. The state’s decision to approximate the wholesale cost at 75% of the retail selling price exacerbates this issue.

  • Elevated excise taxes based on inflated wholesale cost estimates.
  • Difficulty in maintaining competitive pricing against larger dispensaries with economies of scale.
  • Squeezed profit margins as microbusinesses struggle to absorb the higher tax burden without passing it on to consumers.

These pricing pressures further magnify the challenges faced by microbusinesses, making it imperative for them to explore various strategies such as cost optimization, product diversification, and exploring new markets to mitigate the impact of these pricing pressures.

Example Scenarios

  1. Cultivation Costs: A microbusiness cultivating up to 3,500 square feet indoors must navigate higher per-unit costs due to inefficient economies of scale compared to larger operations.
  2. Tax Calculation: If a microbusiness sells $100,000 worth of cannabis, they would pay excise taxes on an estimated $75,000 wholesale value, regardless of actual production costs.

These challenges necessitate innovative strategies and potential legislative advocacy to ensure that microbusinesses can survive and thrive under New York’s evolving cannabis tax landscape.

Alternative Strategies for Microbusinesses to Navigate the Excise Tax Landscape

Microbusinesses facing challenges under the new excise tax regime can consider several alternative strategies to mitigate its impact. One notable approach is the third-party purchase of cannabis. This allows microbusinesses to acquire cannabis from other licensed cultivators, cooperatives, or collectives, potentially reducing their tax burden.

Third-Party Purchases

Engaging in third-party purchases of cannabis products offers several potential benefits:

  • Tax Reduction: By purchasing up to 500 pounds of cannabis or its extract equivalent per calendar year from a duly licensed source, microbusinesses might pay the 9% excise tax on the wholesale price rather than 75% of the retail sales price.
  • Cost Management: This strategy allows microbusinesses to manage costs more effectively by leveraging wholesale prices, which could be significantly lower than their retail counterparts.

However, this approach also comes with potential drawbacks:

  • Supply Chain Dependence: Relying on third-party suppliers may introduce uncertainties related to product availability and quality.
  • Compliance Complexity: Ensuring compliance with state regulations when engaging in third-party purchases requires meticulous record-keeping and legal oversight.

Collaborative Business Models

Microbusinesses might explore collaborative business models to further alleviate the tax burden:

  • Vertical Integration: Combining cultivation, processing, and retail operations under one entity can streamline operations and reduce overall costs.
  • Cooperative Networks: Forming cooperatives with other small businesses can enhance purchasing power and provide better negotiation terms with suppliers.

Cost-Benefit Analysis

Conducting a thorough cost-benefit analysis is crucial:

  • Short-term Gains vs Long-term Viability: While third-party purchases may offer immediate tax relief, businesses must assess long-term sustainability.
  • Legal Consultation: Engaging legal professionals ensures that businesses adhere to regulatory requirements and optimize their tax strategies effectively.

By exploring these alternative strategies, microbusinesses can navigate the complexities of the excise tax landscape more efficiently and position themselves for sustainable growth.

The Future of Cannabis Businesses in New York State

The cannabis industry in New York is going through a big change right now. Instead of paying a tax based on the strength of their products, businesses will now pay an excise tax. This new tax system aims to make things easier and less expensive for many companies. It’s expected to create a more competitive market, especially benefiting bigger dispensaries in cities like Manhattan.

How Cannabis Operators Can Succeed in the Changing Landscape

To do well in this evolving industry, cannabis businesses need to be ready and able to change. Here are some important things they should do:

  1. Stay updated: Keep learning about new laws and tax rules so you can avoid any problems with following them.
  2. Adjust your plans: Have flexible business strategies that can handle changes in how much people want to buy and what they’re willing to pay.
  3. Get expert help: Work with professionals who know a lot about cannabis taxes, like lawyers or accountants who specialize in this area. They can give you advice on how to manage your money better and make sure you’re following all the rules.

What Lies Ahead for Cannabis Businesses in New York

The future seems bright for larger cannabis companies operating under the new excise tax system. However, smaller businesses may face difficulties due to increased costs and competition.

In order to thrive in this changing landscape, it’s important for all cannabis operators to focus on:

By prioritizing these key factors, cannabis businesses of all sizes can position themselves for long-term success in the New York market.


The shift from potency tax to excise tax is a great opportunity for the growth and sustainability of New York’s cannabis industry. By changing to a simpler and more predictable tax system, businesses can better handle their financial responsibilities and potentially offer more competitive prices to consumers.

To navigate this new situation effectively, cannabis operators should:

  • Seek professional advice: Consulting with legal and financial experts will help ensure compliance with New York state law and optimize tax planning.
  • Utilize available resources: Leveraging services like Roach420 can provide essential guidance on tax strategies and business operations.
  • Stay informed: Keeping up with regulatory changes and market trends is crucial for making informed decisions.

By following these steps, businesses can make the most of their savings under the new tax rules, creating a stronger and more resilient cannabis market in New York.

FAQs (Frequently Asked Questions)

What are the key takeaways for New York cannabis operators regarding the new tax regulations?

Most New York cannabis operators are expected to benefit from the removal of the potency tax and introduction of the new excise tax system. It is important for cannabis businesses in the state to understand the new tax regulations to navigate this opportunity effectively.

How did the previous potency tax work and what were its limitations?

The previous potency tax had limitations for both businesses and consumers. It is important to understand how it worked and why it was not suitable for the industry.

What is the potential impact of the excise tax on different types of cannabis businesses, particularly Manhattan dispensaries?

The excise tax may benefit Manhattan dispensaries by reducing their overall tax burden. It is important for cannabis businesses to understand how this new tax system may affect them.

What are the main differences between the new excise tax system and the previous potency tax, specifically in terms of THC content?

It is essential to highlight the main contrasts between the new excise tax system and the previous approach based on THC content to understand how the industry has evolved.

What specific challenges could microbusinesses face under the new excise tax law?

Microbusinesses could face increased compliance costs and pricing pressures due to higher tax rates on wholesale cannabis. It is important to address these challenges and explore potential solutions.

What alternative strategies can microbusinesses consider to navigate the excise tax landscape?

Microbusinesses can consider engaging in third-party purchases of cannabis products as a possible solution to mitigate the impact of the excise tax. It is important to weigh the potential benefits and drawbacks of this alternative business model.

What is the outlook for New York’s cannabis industry in light of the new tax regulations?

The current state of the industry and its outlook in light of the new tax regulations should be discussed, emphasizing the need for cannabis operators to stay informed, adapt their strategies, and leverage available resources to thrive in this evolving market environment.

How can readers ensure compliance and maximize their savings under the new tax regime?

Readers are encouraged to take proactive steps, such as seeking professional advice and utilizing tax planning services like, to ensure compliance and maximize their savings under the new tax regime.

Similar Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.